April 1 - Intro to Homeopathy Online/Email Classes - 2 different ones!

Please see below about On-Line Homeopathy Classes!

 

All classes are taught by Sheri Nakken Email: homeopathycuresyou@gmail.com

 

Please REGISTER ON-LINE at the links below.

April 1      Introduction to Homeopathy Online/Email Classes

I've had a HUGE interest in my homeopathy online/email class that I have been teaching for nearly 9 years now.

I have created 2 introductory classes - one that is 4 months (and then has an optional Part 2) and one that is 6 weeks (and has optional Part 2 & Part 3 for those who want to go further.)

A. Introduction to Homeopathy, Part 1 of 2 - 4 month course - next class starts Friday, April 1, 2011 - for those that have the time and dedication (or a background in use of homeopathy) to really get into the laws and principles and how to take a case, repertorize and find & give a remedy.

B. Introduction to Homeopathy, Part 1 of 3 - 6 week course - next class starts Friday, April 1, 2011 - for those that don't have much time to devote to learning homeopathy in detail as in above 4 month course - this is a shorter, easier, quick introduction so you can get started using homeopathy right away (then there are further classes if you want to go into it more deeply after this shorter Part 1.)

All classes are taught by:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath   
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start March 25 & April 1

 

Dangers of Gardasil (HPV) - Watch 5 minute video

Please view this 5 min video “Gardasil Vaccine Victims and Deaths” at http://bit.ly/eLj4Th 

 

This video was made to share with doctors and nurses for them to consider stopping Gardasil use in their offices.

Webpage is linked at bottom of above video http://www.DutytoInform.org

Article: Prepare, Don't Panic Article by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

Prepare, Don't Panic Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

While our thoughts and prayers go out to persons in Japan and their families, across the country, concerns about the potential for nuclear exposure are in our thoughts here at home. 

According to the media and government experts, Americans on the West Coast are not at high risk for radioactive fallout.

 

But as large aftershocks continue to occur, the world may only be one hard shake away from a global disaster. It's not too early for everyone in North America to prepare. But what is the best course of action? Read Dr. Tenpenny's important blog post about what you should do. 

http://tenpennyimc.com/Blog/post/2011/03/17/Prepare-but-dont-overreact.aspx

Prepare But Don't Overreact

Thursday, 17 March 2011 09:24 by Dr Sherri

NaturalNews.com is putting out a lot of good information about the uses of iodine and disaster planning. I'm working on an article about iodine that will be done soon. In the mean time, I wanted to share a few important points.

Iodine chemistry, iodine/thyroid issues are really complex. When it is ingested, it is rapidly absorbed in the stomach and duodenum. Iodate, widely used in salt iodization, is reduced in the gut and absorbed as iodide. Iodine doesn't stay in the blood stream for very long; under normal circumstances, it has either been absorbed into tissues or eliminated by the kidneys in less than 12 hours.

In my experience, you won't know how you will respond to iodine until you start taking it. In some, iodine is truly the "cure" to a long list of ailments. In others, it can cause a lot of problems and side effects. Iodine can correct Hashimoto's thyroiditis in some; in others, especially those who are low in selenium, it can *cause* Hashimoto's disease (an autoimmune inflammation of the thyroid). Given the necessity of iodine for life, it is not clear why some people react to iodine in salt or seafood. Side effects can include gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, epigastric pain, and diarrhea), significant total-body rash, and something called "iodide fever". Toxic reactions generally require large doses, but some people are very sensitive and even small doses can cause a reaction. For patients on thyroid medications, taking iodine can effect their required dosage -- they may require less...or more. In almost everyone, the TSH will go up while on iodine, as explained below.

It takes 150 micrograms per day to prevent a goiter, but iodine is also required for the rest of the body requires more. For example, 3000 mcg/day (3mg) is necessary to keep breasts healthy and it has been recommended that approximately 12,000 mcg/day (12mg/d) is needed to keep the entire body healthy. The Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for iodine is the amount expected to meet the needs of 50% of people in a specific age group, based on a review of the medical/scientific literature. The government also suggests something called the UL, the Upper Limit dose that most healthy people can tolerate without a side effect. Here is a table that gives an idea of the recommended amounts for you and your children. Up to 10 times these amounts, if added gradually, will not cause a problem.

Iodine is necessary for health of many organs including the pancreas, liver, and mucosa of gastric, small, and large intestine, nasopharynx, choroid plexus and the ciliary body of the eye, the skin, and the following glands: saliva, lacrimal (tear ducts) and both lactating and non-lactating mammary glands. TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) increases the activity of the Sodium-Iodine Symporter (NIS) that drives iodine into the thyroid and into the cells of the other organs. That is the reason that the TSH blood levels increase when patients are taking iodine -- the TSH is needed to drive iodine into the cells.

Since many, if not most, people in the US and Canada are at least mildly iodine deficient, it is necessary to gradually increase the amount of iodine in your diet or as supplementation to avoid complications of suddenly introducing large amounts into your diet. Rapid addition of iodine can cause a list of side effects including thyroid suppression, palpitations, and skin rashes. Interestingly, a sudden increase in iodine intake may be linked to the development of a goiter, which is paradoxical since most goiters are linked to iodine deficiency.

The best way to be proactive is to start adding foods into your diet that are very high in iodine. Here’s a short list:

* Kelp (sea vegetable) – ? ounce, 415.00 mcg

* Yogurt (low-fat) – 1 cup, 87.22 mcg

* Cow’s milk (2%) – 1 cup, 58.56 mcg

* Egg (whole, boiled) – 1 each, 23.76 mcg

* Sardines and mackerel, fish with the highest iodine concentrations have approximately 250 ?g of iodine/100 g

* Strawberries – 1 cup, 12.96 mcg

* Seaweed is particularly rich in iodine: that is, concentrations are 100-1000 times higher than in fish.  Kombu, a commonly consumed seaweed, contains approximately 130,000 ?g of iodine/100 g

Other foods with small amounts iodine include Miso soup, spirulina, chlorella, brassica vegetables, beans and lentils. Cod liver oil and olive oil have vitamin A and D, both important for overall health.

When taking iodine supplements, it is important to also take the mineral selenium (100-200mcg/day). Selenium interacts uniquely with iodine. It has antioxidant properties and protects the thyroid during the synthesis of thyroid hormones. It is also important for both activation and inactivation of thyroid hormone at the cellular level.  Increasing iodine foods and/or adding supplments slowly is a reasonable response to the current conditions. Potassium iodide, whose chemical formula is KI, is the recommended form of iodine to take in the event of radiation exposure because it saturates the thyroid gland. Once saturated, the thyroid – and the body – cannot absorb radioactive iodine if the tissues are saturated with healthy iodine. Another form of iodine, potassium iodate, is second option. Potassium iodate includes one molecule of oxygen that not only extends the product's shelf life, but helps to eliminate the bitter taste of potassium iodide. While KI has been the most studied, both types of the tablets can provide protection. 

While iodine is sold primarily as a supplement, it deserves respect. Consuming anything other than small quantities should be done under the supervision of a physician or healthcare provider familiar with its chemical quirks. This is especially true if you are taking thyroid medication or have other thyroid problems. Taking massive dosages of iodine, such as the government- recommended 130 mg/day in the event of a radiation exposure, is definitely not necessary, unless you are right next to the reactor. Massive doses should be reserved for only extreme and confirmed exposures. In fact, a study in the New England Journal of Medicine done to determine the dose of KI in the event of a nuclear accident or fallout have shown that a single dose of 30 mg of iodine will suppress the uptake of radioactive iodine to less than 1.5% within 24 hr, Daily doses of 15 mg will maintain uptake of radioactive iodine below 2%.

It is always good to be prepared. In this instance, it is really important to not overreact.

 

The definitive guide to the healing powers of homeopathy, by vinton mccabe

St. martin's press, new york, 1997, 334 pages, $24.95 (us). reviewed by julian winston
 This is the latest of a number of recently published books about homeopathy. The author was identified in the "advance uncorrected proofs" as "America's foremost teacher of homeopathy" and "president of the Connecticut Homeopathic Association."
 The book is divided into three main sections: "Unlearning," "Learning," and "Experiencing." By doing this, the author has created a book that really addresses the issues which are at the core of doing homeopathy-mainly the need to understand that the model of homeopathy is very different from the conventional medical model. If you look at homeopathy as simply "natural pills" you will find little success with it. And it is the "unlearning" of these concepts that McCabe discusses in the first section. Along the way, McCabe treats us to some very nice insights. For example, while commenting on how we are bombarded with ads which continually say that the new product is, "stronger than ever," McCabe says, "...if the product worked in the first place its strength would not need enhancement."

 The second section, "Learning," begins with a history of homeopathy. While scanning through the book I was impressed with the subheadings -an interesting and perceptive way of looking at the people involved and their contributions. We have "Hippocrates: Healer as a demi-god;" "Celcus: Healer as a rebel;" Discorades: Healer as a naturalist;" "Galen: Healer as a warrior;" Paracelsus: Healer as a madman;" Hahnemann: Healer as a revolutionary;" Hering: Healer as a disciple;" Hughes: Healer as a demagogue;" Kent: Healer as a Mystic;" Bach: Healer as an evolutionary." But it is during this section that, for me, the book began to unravel.
 McCabe begins the chapter by saying, "History is a hard thing to get right. We have only paper trails of journals, letters, and notebooks to follow." In the Acknowledgments at the front of the book, the author says, "In writing any book, especially a first book, the author has to be able to lean back and trust there will be someone to catch him." Obviously, in selecting those to catch him he did not include an historian.
 If someone spends 31 pages-almost 10% of the book-on history, then there is the underlying assumption that this has some kind of importance to the subject. And, indeed, the author suggests that the message should be looked at in the context of the messengers. It is unfortunate that this section of the book contains much mis-information, even more so because the correct information is readily available in other books and journals. As a first example, the author perpetuates two grand "homeopathic myths"-first, that Hahnemann had the idea for potentization by observing that the remedies he carried in his saddlebags were stronger than the ones he kept at home and second, that Hering's wife sat at his bedside through his Lachesis delirium and took copious notes.
 Both of these topics were discussed in an article I wrote in Homeopathy Today, June 1992. Both ideas are myths and not supported by fact. Hahnemann introduced dilution and succussion simply as a method of getting a good mix. It was not until much later in his career that he began to think of succussion as a way of making the medicines more powerful. He DOES comment upon people carrying liquids in saddlebags in a footnote to Paragraph 270 in the 4th and 5th editions of the Organon. There is no evidence, however, that the carrying of liquid remedies was what sparked Hahnemann. The myth-story probably grew from a comment in an early edition of Stapf 's Archive concerning the carrying of liquid potencies by horseback. As far as Hering's Lachesis proving, the story, in his own words, is very clear-no wife, no delirium. If these were the only two historical transgressions, I might have been kinder in my criticism. But there are more.
 In the chapter on Hahnemann, the are glaring errors of fact, which border on fabrication. McCabe says:
 "In 1792 the ailing Duke Leopold II of Austria sent for Hahnemann for treatment. After working with Hahnemann and his new diluted medicines, Leopold improved so greatly that Hahnemann returned home. However, after Hahnemann left his side, Leopold, following the advice of his other physicians, began to mix the homeopathics with allopathic medicines. He soon died."
 McCabe goes on to describe how Hahnemann returned for the funeral and followed the casket through the streets shouting curses at those who had killed the duke. This entire scenario would make a great movie, but it is a complete fabrication. Leopold II was a muchloved ruler, and his country had high hopes for his reign. He died after an illness and his physicians, seeking to explain his death to the public, published an account of their treatment which included the fact that Leopold was bled on four occasions. Upon reading the account Hahnemann wrote an outraged letter to the newspaper about the barbarism of conventional medicine. It was this incident which crystallized in Hahnemann his hatred of conventional medicine. Hahnemann NEVER met or treated Leopold. It should be remembered that Hahnemann's first paper about the "principle" of homeopathy was not published until 1796. In 1792 Hahnemann hadn't even formulated the idea of homeopathy, let alone the use of diluted remedies.
 McCabe then describes Hahnemann's treatment of Herr Klockenbring-who was the only patient in a home for the insane to which Hahnemann was given charge in 1792. Says McCabe:
 "At last Hahnemann reached his decision as to which of his remedies would help Klockenbring. He gave a single dose of Antimonium tartaricum, made from the metal antimony. Within six months, Klockenbring had recovered sufficiently to enter the world." How does this account fit with the "real" account-as described by Richard Haehl-who wrote the ultimate, two volume biography of Hahnemann? Again, Hahnemann didn't have any "remedies" at the time-he didn't begin doing provings and recording symptoms until several years hence. Hahnemann was treating his patient with no medicine, a good dose of compassion, and changes in hygiene and diet. At one point, the patient began to eat to the point of gluttony and Hahnemann prescribed *25 grains* of Tartar Emetic (Ant. t.) to help the patient vomit. That was his only drug prescription. What can we make of these magnificent stories that have no truth? But wait. It continues...
 * McCabe claims that Hahnemann began to experiment with dilution and succussion using TWO scales-the X (1:10) and the C (1:100). There is NO evidence that Hahnemann ever used decimal potencies. The decimal potencies were first suggested by Hering, and produced concurrently in Europe and the USA beginning in the 1840's.
 * McCabe, later in the book, tells us the story of a suffering artist friend of Hahnemann's who was drawing with Sepia ink and kept wetting the brush on his lips to point it. Hahnemann, observing this, suggested that his symptoms might be caused by this very act. McCabe says that Hahnemann observed this, made a remedy from the Sepia, and *gave it* to the artist and cured him. The truth is that Hahnemann suggested that the artist stop "dosing himself " with Sepia (a maintaining cause), and the symptoms subsided. NO remedy was given. It was THIS experience that began Hahnemann's first investigation of Sepia. (The story, from Farrington, is found in Tyler's Drug Pictures.)
 * McCabe says that Melanie came to see Hahnemann because of a "chronic respiratory condition, tuberculosis." Both Hahnemann and Melanie have written of their meeting. The story is well told in Rima Handley's book, A Homeopathic Love Story. Melanie was cured, writes Hahnemann, of a "kind of tic douloreaux in her right hypogastrium," not of tuberculosis.
 Finally, McCabe writes:
 "...Hahnemann was buried like a pauper. His body was laid to rest at the Montmartre Cemetery in Paris at Public Grave 8, where the coffin was placed in an ancient tri-level vault, resting above two strangers." Again, the facts are distorted. It was not a public grave but a plot belonging to Melanie. Certainly Hahnemann had never met the "two strangers" in the vault, but they were buried there by Melanie-Guillaume Lethiere, her painting teacher and foster-father, and Louis Jerome Gohier, a political figure who, upon his death, left Melanie his estate and his name. As Rima Handley pointed out in her book, the grave at Montmartre contained the bodies of "...the other two men she had profoundly loved and revered."
 Enough of Hahnemann and Hering. What about Edward Bach, who McCabe refers to as a homeopath? Bach learned of homeopathy at the Homeopathic Hospital in London when he accepted a position there as a pathologist and bacteriologist. Bach never practiced as a homeopath. McCabe says: "In developing his system...Bach returned to his homeopathic training in order to create remedies based in Hahnemann's system of healing. Bach's plants, once selected, were made into mother tinctures or zero-potency homeopathic remedies. They are, strictly speaking, homeopathic, although they are neither diluted nor succussed, as traditional remedies are." Excuse me? First, Bach never had "homeopathic training." Second, the Bach remedies were originally made from dew collected from the flowers in the morning. They are now made by floating petals of flowers on pure water in the sunlight. The petals are removed when they wilt and the water is then mixed with brandy to prevent spoiling. These are not homeopathic tinctures. Furthermore, they have never had Hahnemannian provings done, a listing of symptoms have not been compiled, and they are not prescribed based on their similarity. Therefore, they are not homeopathic. Plain and simple. How a book that is talking about the purity of homeopathic thought and the exactness of the process can turn around and claim these remedies as homeopathic is beyond my understanding.
 After this, "Learning" section, the book moves into "Experiencing" and McCabe outlines 12 remedies that he sees as "acute" followed by 12 more "constitutional" remedies. The descriptions of the acute remedies are a condensed materia medica, although the part about "remedy source" is somewhat misinformed-specifically in reference to Apis where he says: "Live honeybees are put in a bottle, and the bees irritated by shaking the bottle. For eight days, the bottle is opened just long enough to pour in diluted alcohol. The bottle is shaken some more to anger the bees and get them to emit venom. When the bees die, the alcohol is poured out..." According to the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia, the live bees are put in the bottle, the bottle shaken to irritate them, and the alcohol is poured over them-drowning them. The bottle is shaken twice a day for ten days (to stir it), and then the alcohol is filtered off.
 McCabe then discusses 12 "constitutional" remedies. They have interesting sub-heads: Sulphur, the egoist; Arsenicum, the controller; Calcarea, the laborer; Lycopodium, the counterfeit; Natrum, the caretaker; Nux, the aggressor; Phosphorus, the charmer; Pulsatilla, the Marshmallow; Rhus, the codependent; Sepia, the bitch; Silica, the coward; Thuja, the stranger. Each of the chapters contains a remedy overview, plus the headings: Remedy theme, Remedy motivation, Emotional portrait, Physical portrait, and Poster child-the last a "picture" of someone who "is" the remedy; for Sulphur, Einstein, Homer Simpson, and Santa Claus are suggested models.
 When others (Coulter, Bailey, Zaren, Vithoulkas) have produced remedy "pictures," the information has usually been distilled from their years of practice. And the way one person "sees" a remedy might be quite different to the way another might "see" it. The information that McCabe presents in his materia medica has me wondering from where is it derived, as the material is comprised of statements without quotes. I asked two professional homeopaths, each with over 15 years experience, to read through a few of the materia medica chapters. One commented, "It's almost there but, from my experience, just slightly skewed. If one of my students gave me that chapter as an essay on the remedy, I'd say, 'well, you almost have it but you missed the central core.'" The other homeopath expressed a similar feeling and said while some of the material coincides directly with her clinical experience, she has never seen any of the remedies present in quite the way they are described, and wondered, as I did, from where the information was gleaned.
 Furthermore, a good exercise is to take a repertory and try to find the symptoms that are listed in the materia medica. While McCabe stresses the "lying" nature of Thuja, I can find Thuja in the rubric "Deceitful, sly," but absent from the rubric "Liar." Most materia medica presented through painting "psycho-physical" portraits of people and their behaviors, comes across as definitive-this IS the way it is. The materia medica here is no exception and should be taken as an interesting idea, not as gospel truth. Seeing Bill Clinton as the "poster child" for Phosphorus, or Jeffrey Dahmer as a model for Thuja does not strike very responsive chords with me.
 The remedy chapter is followed by a chapter on "transformation" that discusses, fairly well, the concept of the nosodes and the miasms.
 The book concludes with basic advice ("study the Organon, get a materia medica, get a repertory") as well as the suggestion to "experience homeopathic healing in your own life...Finding a homeopathic practitioner who can work with you as a partner in the healing process." The last chapter, "A Redefinition of terms" is a glossary and, once again, I find inexplicable information contained within. The "Kentian Octave" is described as the progression of potencies that Kent used in treating chronic disease. McCabe lists them as: 9C, 12C, 30C, 200C, 1M, 10M, LM, CM. Earlier in the book McCabe says that in chronic cases, "Kent...tended to begin with very a low potency, say a 9C or 12C." Really?
 In 1912, Kent published an article called "Series and Degrees" in the Homeopathician. It has been re-printed in Kent's "Lesser Writings." In the article Kent suggested the following series: "30, 200, 1m, 10m, 50m, cm, dm, mm." I have never seen any reference for Kent using a 9C or a 12C (which were never common potencies in the U.S. , although they were more often seen in Europe). If anyone can tell me where Kent wrote about using a 9C and 12C, I would be happy to be corrected.
 McCabe also contributes another piece of misinformation when he says early in the book (and repeats in the glossary) that there is another scale of remedy manufacture called the "millennial" scale which begins a step above the 999C. In this scale, he asserts, the dilution is done by the thousands, and the remedies are labeled with an "M." This is not the first time I have heard this idea, and I have no idea where it came from. But, it is being propagated once again.
 Homeopathic remedies have always been made on the centesimal scale where the serial dilution is one part in 100. A 1M potency is the same as 1,000C; a 10M the same as a 10,000C. The Roman numeral "M" was used to signify "thousands" and NOT a dilution factor of 1:1000. The "X", or decimal potencies, are made 1:10 and are called "D" potencies in Europe.
 The THIRD scale, which McCabe does not discuss at all, is the fifty-millesimal or Quinquagenimillesimal potencies (called Q or, inaccurately, LM's) that Hahnemann discussed in the 6th edition of the Organon. The "millennial" scale does not exist in any of the homeopathy I'm familiar with. In summary, "Let Like Cure Like" is a book which, on the surface, provides some very good information about the homeopathic process. It is well written, and the theoretical parts are exceptionally clear. When I began to read it, I was captured by it. The first 40 or so pages had me thinking that what I was reading was never quite said in that way, and certainly was some of the most concise summations I'd come across. There was a small shudder when I saw Edward Bach referred to as a "British homeopath" and another shudder a page later when, in reference to homeopathic remedies, I read, "Hahnemann tells us that we can also think of them as vaccinations." But then the book settled out, only to fall apart in the history section, after which it never quite came together again.
 A teacher friend always tells her students that when they give their papers to someone to check, they should make sure that the person is competent to check it. In the present case, the author "trusted someone to catch him" but obviously asked the wrong people, and the book suffers. But it is not just a manuscript-it is in print-and it will perpetuate these falsities and half-truths to another generation. THAT is a tragedy that could have easily been avoided.

Corvus corax The homeopathic proving

(Plain type indicates one prover, italic indicates two provers, bold indicates three or more provers)
 Unique remedy symptom rubrics
 Mind
 ABSORBED; in her own closed world
 ANGER, irascibility; with frustrated efforts
 ANXIETY; defend, when she needed to, herself
 DELUSIONS; body; enlarged; in chest area, as if ribs bowed out
 DELUSIONS; dark; things looked, as if less light in the world
 DELUSIONS; defenseless, feels she is, with panic and anxiety
 DELUSIONS; floating in a higher dimension
 DELUSIONS; protect, she must, herself

 DELUSIONS; queen, she is like a
 DELUSIONS; smell; wet animal fur
 DELUSIONS; space, as if in
 DELUSIONS; space; empty space inside skull at root of nose
 DELUSIONS; wind, she is pushed back and forth by a strong
 DELUSIONS; worlds, she is on the divide between two worlds
 DESPAIR; of the beauty and life destroyed by humans
 DISCONTENTED, displeased, dissatisfied; frustrated efforts with sadness and agitation
 DREAMS; anger; at family
 DREAMS; animals; lion, resembling a tiny, feeding on garbage and glowing from slime
 DREAMS; anxious; packing to go home
 DREAMS; bird, a beautiful flying
 DREAMS; breaking glass
 DREAMS; buildings; crumbling
 DREAMS; concrete; cold, hard
 DREAMS; danger to animals
 DREAMS; danger to children
 DREAMS; dark and dirty, felt she was
 DREAMS; dogs; bitten, by, of being; its mouth like a beak
 DREAMS; dying, she could not save a woman who was
 DREAMS; father
 DREAMS; frightful, without fear
 DREAMS; fields, woods, and wilderness
 DREAMS; houses; beautiful
 DREAMS; houses; damaged
 DREAMS; killing, a black parrot
 DREAMS; lying, not telling the truth
 DREAMS; magician's apprentice, she was a
 DREAMS; mountain climbing
 DREAMS; nature, of pristine, ruined by man
 DREAMS; people, of; in mobs, furious and looting
 DREAMS; playing a game
 DREAMS; poisonous smoke, an oil refinery belching out clouds of
 DREAMS; safeguarding others
 DREAMS; singing
 DREAMS; smugglers
 DREAMS; spell, she was put under a
 DREAMS; spiders; scorpions
 DREAMS; mocked, of being
 DREAMS; pinched, of being
 DREAMS; shrieking, yelling, shouting
 DREAMS; teaching
 DREAMS; threatening to kill herself
 DREAMS; torture
 DREAMS; trespassed upon, she is
 DREAMS; undercover, she is an FBI agent
 PLEASURE; in eating; tasting, smelling, and biting food
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; noise, too; of crows
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; odors, to; of menstrual blood
 SHRIEKING, screaming, shouting; rage, with; at injustices, ugliness and death
 SLEEPLESSNESS; thoughts, from; of revenge and anger
 SYMPATHETIC, compassionate; animals; skunks
 TRANQUILLITY, serenity, calmness; alternating with cough
 Vertigo
 SLOW; circling
 Head pain
 PRESSING; in waves
 Face
 ELONGATED sensation
 Nose
 OPEN sensation
 Stomach
 NAUSEA; beer; amel.
 Cough
 ECHO, like an; over and over
 Chest
 CHEST; CONSTRICTION; sadness, with
 FORCING out; from lungs
 HEAT; lungs, sensation of, in
 HEAVINESS; lungs, sensation of
 LUNGS; sponge, as if lungs were a, water would run out
 SENSITIVE; lungs
 Extremity pain
 UPPER LIMBS; Shoulder; extending to; arm; left
 Generalities
 FOOD and drinks; green foods, desire for
 Common remedy symptom rubrics
 Mind
 ACTIVITY; hyperactive
 ACTIVITY; prostration, with physical
 AILMENTS from; business; losses
 AILMENTS from; excitement; emotional, general symptoms from
 ANGER, irascibility
 ANGER, irascibility; anxiety, with
 ANGER, irascibility; easily
 ANGER, irascibility; himself, with
 ANXIETY
 ANXIETY; morning; waking; on
 ANXIETY; anger; during
 ANXIETY; body, felt in
 ANXIETY; breathing; difficult, with
 ANXIETY; dyspnea, in
 ANXIETY; excitement, from
 ANXIETY; headache, with
 ANXIETY; health, about
 ANXIETY; hurry, with
 ANXIETY; nervous
 ANXIETY; others, for
 ANXIETY; trifles, about
 ANXIETY; trifles, about; things coming near him, especially of
 AWARENESS heightened
 AWKWARD
 BITING; nails
 CARES, worries; full of
 CLAIRVOYANT
 COMPANY; desire for
 CONCENTRATION; difficult; morning
 CONFUSION
 COUNTRY, desire for
 DEATH; dying, feels as if
 DEATH; thoughts of
 DECEITFUL, sly
 DELIRIUM; staring, with
 DELUSIONS; arms; separated, from body
 DELUSIONS; body; separated, as if body or thoughts were
 DELUSIONS; bugs and cockroaches, of
 DELUSIONS; calls; someone
 DELUSIONS; danger; impression of
 DELUSIONS; deceived, being
 DELUSIONS; eyelashes are enlarged
 DELUSIONS; hand, hands; separated from body
 DELUSIONS; head, heads; separated from body, is
 DELUSIONS; poison, of
 DELUSIONS; time; space, and, lost or confused
 DISCONTENTED, displeased, dissatisfied
 DREAMS; accidents, of; crash of plane
 DREAMS; amorous
 DREAMS; anger
 DREAMS; animals
 DREAMS; animals; wild
 DREAMS; animal fur
 DREAMS; anxious
 DREAMS; beaten, being
 DREAMS; blood; bleeding, that she is, in menorrhagia
 DREAMS; boyfriend, of; old
 DREAMS; bugs
 DREAMS; business, of
 DREAMS; children, about
 DREAMS; cleaning
 DREAMS; crimes; committing
 DREAMS; conspiracies
 DREAMS; cruelty
 DREAMS; cutting; knife, of being cut with a
 DREAMS; danger
 DREAMS; danger; escaping from a
 DREAMS; dead; bodies
 DREAMS; dead; people, of; friends; talking with deceased friends
 DREAMS; devils
 DREAMS; disgusting
 DREAMS; dogs
 DREAMS; dying
 DREAMS; eating
 DREAMS; escape, of
 DREAMS; explosion
 DREAMS; family, own
 DREAMS; fights
 DREAMS; fire
 DREAMS; fishes
 DREAMS; flowers
 DREAMS; flying
 DREAMS; friends; old
 DREAMS; guns; shots
 DREAMS; hiding from danger, of
 DREAMS; high places
 DREAMS; horses
 DREAMS; Indians, that he is among
 DREAMS; injuries
 DREAMS; jealousy
 DREAMS; magic
 DREAMS; music
 DREAMS; nakedness, about
 DREAMS; noise; loud
 DREAMS; people, of; assembled
 DREAMS; people, of; black
 DREAMS; prisoner; being taken a
 DREAMS; pursued by, of being
 DREAMS; rape; threats of
 DREAMS; repeating
 DREAMS; revolution
 DREAMS; running; after someone
 DREAMS; sad
 DREAMS; stealing
 DREAMS; suicide
 DREAMS; threats
 DREAMS; war
 DREAMS; water; waves, of high
 DREAMS; wounded, of being
 DREAMS; wrong; doing
 EMOTIONS; easily excited
 ESCAPE, attempts to; run away, to
 FEAR; death, of; angina pectoris, in
 FEAR; death, of; heart symptoms, during
 FEAR; death, of; respiratory problems, with
 FEAR; dying, of
 FEAR; poisoned; of being
 FEAR; sleep; go to, to; lest; nightmare, he would have a
 FORGETFUL
 FORSAKEN feeling
 FREEDOM remarkable, in doing what he had to do
 GRIEF; silent
 HELPLESSNESS, feeling of
 HURRY, haste; occupation, in
 IMPATIENCE; trifles, about
 INDOLENCE, aversion to work
 INDOLENCE, aversion to work; difficulties, in face of
 IRRITABILITY; morning; waking, on
 IRRITABILITY; sadness, with
 LAUGHING; desires
 LIGHTNESS, feeling of
 MALICIOUS, spiteful, vindictive
 OCCUPATION, diversion; amel.
 OBSTINATE, headstrong; resists wishes of others
 RAGE, fury; cursing, with
 RESTLESSNESS, nervousness; pacing back and forward
 SADNESS, despondency, dejection, mental depression, gloom, melancholy
 SADNESS, despondency, dejection, mental depression, gloom, melancholy; anxious
 SADNESS, despondency, dejection, mental depression, gloom, melancholy; grief; with
 SADNESS, despondency, dejection, mental depression, gloom, melancholy; preoccupied
 SADNESS, despondency, dejection, mental depression, gloom, melancholy; silent
 SADNESS, despondency, dejection, mental depression, gloom, melancholy; talk, indisposed to
 SADNESS, despondency, dejection, mental depression, gloom, melancholy; weeping; with
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; criticism, to
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; emotional
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; external impressions, to all
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; light, to
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; noise, to
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; odors, to
 SENSITIVE, oversensitive; surprise, to slight
 SHRIEKING, screaming, shouting
 SHRIEKING, screaming, shouting; anger, during
 SHRIEKING, screaming, shouting; hysteria, in
 SHRIEKING, screaming, shouting; joy, from
 SHRIEKING, screaming, shouting; pain, with the
 SHRIEKING, screaming, shouting; trembling, with
 STARTING, startled; noise, from
 SUICIDAL disposition; thoughts
 SUFFERING; intense
 SYMPATHY, compassion; desire for
 SYMPATHETIC, compassionate
 SYMPATHETIC, compassionate; misfortune of others, greatly affected by
 TALK, talking, talks; desires to, to some one
 TALK, talking, talks; indisposed to, desire to be silent, taciturn
 THINKING; complaints, of; agg.
 THOUGHTS; anxious; condition, about, with desire to talk
 THOUGHTS; hurried
 THOUGHTS; outside of body, as if
 THOUGHTS; persistent; waking, on
 TIME; loss of conception of
 WAIT, as if he has to
 WEEPING, tearful mood
 WEEPING, tearful mood; pains; with
 WRONG; things of which she only thinks
 Vertigo
 BENDING head, on; forward
 LOOKING; downward
 NAUSEA; with
 RIGHT, swaying toward; in a circle
 RISING; seat, from a
 Head
 FOG, brain feels as if surrounded by
 HAIR; affections of; greasy
 TIRED feeling
 Head pain
 GENERAL
 GENERAL; eating; during
 GENERAL; drinking; cold drinks; amel.
 GENERAL; motion; agg.; quick
 GENERAL; waves of pain
 LOCALIZATION; Forehead
 LOCALIZATION; Forehead; eyes; behind eyes
 LOCALIZATION; Forehead; nose, above root of
 LOCALIZATION; Sides; right
 LOCALIZATION; Temples
 LOCALIZATION; Temples; left
 LOCALIZATION; Temples; right
 CUTTING, darting, stabbing
 Eye
 DRYNESS
 PAIN; burning
 PAIN; stitching; needles, as if thrust into eyeball
 STICKY
 TWITCHING; lids; left
 Vision
 BLURRED
 BLURRED; headache; before
 COLORS; eyes, before the; variegated
 SPOTS; bright
 Nose
 CATARRH; post-nasal
 ENLARGED sensation
 Face
 HEAT; flushes
 HEAT; chin
 ITCHING
 SWELLING; eyes; under
 Mouth
 DRYNESS; Tongue
 PAIN; burnt, as if
 STICKY, viscid; Tongue
 Throat
 CHOKING, constricting
 CHOKING, constricting; breathing, when
 PAIN; general; morning; waking, on
 PAIN; general; right
 PAIN; general; swallowing; on
 PAIN; general; extending to; stomach
 SWELLING; Tonsils
 Stomach
 APPETITE; constant
 APPETITE; easy satiety; hunger, in spite of great
 APPETITE; eat, with inability to
 APPETITE; increased, hunger in general
 APPETITE; insatiable
 APPETITE; nibbling
 APPETITE; ravenous, canine, excessive
 ERUCTATIONS; General; eating; while
 GAGGING
 HICCOUGH
 NAUSEA
 NAUSEA; waves, in
 PAIN; General; eating; after; amel.
 THIRST
 VOMITING; General; respiratory symptoms, with
 Rectum
 DIARRHEA; burns after
 DIARRHEA; seashore, while at
 FLATUS
 Stool
 BURNT, as if
 REDDISH
 Bladder
 URINATION; frequent
 URINATION; frequent; night
 Kidneys
 PAIN; General; right
 Urethra
 PAIN; burning; urination; after
 Urine
 BLOODY; clots
 CLOUDY
 COLOR; greenish; green as grass
 Female
 CONTRACTIONS; Uterus
 PAIN; cramping
 PAIN; cramping; Uterus
 PAIN; spasmodic
 SEXUAL desire; increased
 Speech and  voice
 VOICE; hoarseness; sudden
 Respiration
 ACCELERATED; lying down, while
 DIFFICULT
 DIFFICULT; anxiety, from
 DIFFICULT; heart; complaints, in
 DIFFICULT; pain; during
 DIFFICULT; inspiration
 IMPEDED, obstructed
 Cough
 FORENOON; ten am.-noon
 NIGHT; waking from the cough
 TEMPERATURE, change of
 Chest
 EXPAND; as if expanded
 INFLAMMATION; Lungs
 ITCHING; Mammae
 PAIN; General; Heart
 PAIN; General; Heart; moving; agg.
 PAIN; General; Mamma
 PAIN; General; touched, when
 PAIN; aching
 PAIN; sticking; heart
 PALPITATION heart; lying, while
 SENSITIVE; Mammae
 SPASMODIC motion in
 SWELLING; Axilla; Glands
 SWELLING; Mammae
 WEAKNESS; Lungs
 Back
 PAIN; general; lying, while
 PAIN; general; motion; on
 PAIN; general; sitting, while; amel.
 PAIN; general; stool; after; amel.
 PAIN; general; warmth, external; amel.
 PAIN; general; extending to; upward
 PAIN; general; Cervical region
 PAIN; general; Lumbar region
 PERSPIRATION; Cervical region
 RIGIDITY
 SENSITIVE; spine
 STIFFNESS
 Extremities
 COLDNESS; ice, like ice in spots
 COLDNESS; Fingers; tips; icy
 COLDNESS; Foot
 HEAVINESS, tired limbs
 NUMBNESS; Upper Limbs; left; heart disease, in
 NUMBNESS; Fingers
 SHAKING; Hand
 TINGLING, prickling, asleep; Upper
 Limbs
 TINGLING, prickling, asleep; Upper Limbs; left
 Extremity pain
 UPPER LIMBS; left; heart symptoms, with
 UPPER LIMBS; Shoulder; left
 UPPER LIMBS; Shoulder; extending to; back
 UPPER LIMBS; Shoulder; extending to; neck
 UPPER LIMBS; Wrist
 UPPER LIMBS; Thumb; right
 LOWER LIMBS; lying; while
 LOWER LIMBS; sciatica; left
 LOWER LIMBS; sciatica; right
 LOWER LIMBS; walking; amel.
 LOWER LIMBS; Foot
 ACHING; Lower Limbs
 PAIN; CRAMP, like; Leg
 BURNING; Foot
 Sleep
 LONG, too
 RESTLESS
 SLEEPLESSNESS; midnight; before
 SLEEPLESSNESS; worries, due to
 WAKING; midnight; after; four am.
 WAKING; frequent; dreams, from
 Fever
 HEAT in general
 MORNING; waking, on
 COLDNESS, external, with
 INTENSE heat
 Perspiration
 PERSPIRATION in general
 NIGHT
 ODOR; sour
 Skin
 ERUPTIONS; pimples; watery
 SENSITIVENESS; pressure, to
 SWELLING
 Generalities
 AFTERNOON, one pm.-six pm.; two pm.
 AIR; open; amel.
 COLDNESS; icy
 EATING; after; amel.
 EATING; frequent
 FOOD and drinks; fresh food, desires
 FOOD and drinks; fruit; desires
 FOOD and drinks; meat; desires; smoked
 FOOD and drinks; pickles; desires
 FOOD and drinks; sour, acids; desires
 FOOD and drinks; sweets; desires
 HEAVINESS
 HEAVINESS; internally; Bones
 LASSITUDE
 MOTION; agg.; at beginning of
 NUMBNESS; unilateral; right
 PAIN; aching
 PAIN; waves, in
 STIFFNESS, rigidity; Muscles
 SUN, from; amel.
 SWELLING; right side, on
 SWELLING; puffy, oedematous
 TREMBLING; anxiety; from
 TREMBLING; emotions; after
 WEAKNESS, enervation; morning; waking, on
 WOUNDS; infected
 WOUNDS; old; pains, in

Interview with Ananda Zaren

AH: What was your first experience with homeopathy, how did you get started? 
 Zaren: I took a two week introductory course in 1976 and when the course was over I realized that homeopathy was my life's work. I started to explore, at that time, how I would learn homeopathy. 
 AH: Were you looking for an alternative? 
 Zaren: I was attending births, and was feeling quite tired. However I was not looking for an alternative. 
 AH: It seems that your specialty is obstetrics and gynecology. 
 Zaren: In the past that was true, but I learned a long time ago that one has to have a very strong foundation and know materia medica before one can specialize. 
 AH: After you learned homeopathy, you gave up your practice as a midwife? 
 Zaren: It just seemed to slowly go in the direction of homeopathy. I started to study with George Vithoulkas and this led me in the path of pure
homeopathy. 
 AH: How long did you study with him? 
 Zaren: About eight years. 
 AH: In the United States did you continue to study? 
 Zaren: I studied on my own, saw as many patients as I could, but I did not study with anyone else in the United States or Europe. Too many teachers cause confusion for me. The actual patients were my teachers. In 1987 I was invited to do my first seminar in England, then in Switzerland and it went on from there. 
 AH: Being a homeopath is a big job, it's not just about the practice, once you have an understanding of the system you are automatically put into a teaching position, even to re-educate your patients from the beginning. 
 Zaren: A large part of being a homeopath is patient education. At the end of every consultation I educate the patient. This is very important, because the patient must take responsibility and they need to know what this is all about in order to stay with the process. Sometimes its like explaining the unexplainable. 
 AH: You must be successful because you are invited all over the world. 
 Zaren: I have been studying homeopathy a very long time, and have a great deal of experience, and this must be shared with others. 
 AH: How did you become so involved in Germany? 
 Zaren: It started in July of 1988 when I was invited to give a seminar from cases that I would be taping on video two weeks before the seminar. The seminar was a great success and Toni Drahne, M.D.  invited me back to this same hospital in October of 1988 to do a four month project showing the efficiency of homeopathy and the cost effectiveness. I was placed in the OB/GYN, urology, neonatal, pediatrics section of the hospital. Every case was put on video along with the follow ups. I saw cases I would never see in my own practice and learned a great deal. After that I was invited to do supervisions for homeopaths, which was also a learning experience for me and the students. There were about 40 homeopaths who observed my case taking live through closed circuit television. When I was finished the patient left, and I went into the room where the students were and gave an analysis of the case. The students would share their analysis of the case, and remedy choice, then I told them what came up for me. The patient then would come back every three months for two years. This is one of the best ways for the post-graduate student to learn homeopathy. In fact the next supervision I am doing is in Santa Barbara in March of 1997. 
 AH: How did your methodology develop? 
 Zaren: I saw that I was not getting a success rate in my own practice that was satisfying enough. Maybe the first two months were great, but then the cases relapsed or problems started to occur. I decided to work six days a week seeing patients to get the experience. After many years, and many patients, I realized that every living organism is a functional unit. It is not simply a mechanical sum total of organs or symptoms. Mind and body are not separate or parallel to one another, but constitute a unity. Every moment of our lives, both waking and sleeping, our emotions affect our organs, musculature, and hormonal processes, and visa versa. Every experience we undergo leaves some residue in our bodies, and every unexpressed feeling continues to exist within us. In sum, character and body are fully interdependent. 
 I felt that homeopathy needed to be looked at as being the mind and the body are not separate entities. I felt that the role of emotions in health and illness were discounted. We don't put symptoms together and come up with a remedy that came up the highest. We have to focus the case where the biggest wall or congestion occurs. I realized that to understand and cure such illnesses as heart disease, asthma or arthritis, it is absolutely essential for the homeopath to be familiar with emotions and how they are suppressed or distorted. Studies of organic structures, in terms of symptoms, no matter how thorough, can only provide a partial picture of the dimensions of health or disease. We have to really understand the living organism. Also, the etiology of infectious diseases such as typhoid or tuberculosis was not as simple as it had appeared in the days of Pasteur or Koch; susceptibility to such illnesses was intimately related to the overall emotional-physical health of the individual. It is well known that many people could be exposed and never develop the disease, some persons would succumb very quickly and others would become ill more slowly. We must understand that our basic constitution is really the critical determinant of whether we develop a cold, influenza or other illnesses. This susceptibility encompasses both emotional and physical factors. So, the individual's characteristic emotional state is one determinant of whether microorganisms will multiply or be repelled by the body's natural defenses. I would see from my practice, that anyone who suppresses his or her emotions runs the risk of serious health consequences. Most modern degenerative diseases originate in these long-standing patterns of emotional deadening, which begin to create subtle bodily tensions. The insomnia, tension or depression that results is perhaps eased but not erased by tranquilizers. A heart attack or stroke does not "suddenly happen." Illnesses date far back into one's life where a trauma or trauma's took place. Our dispositions are established during the first few years of life. In infancy and childhood, we form particular ways of reacting (walls) to tension producing situations, and these walls remain deeply embedded in our souls, as well as our physical body. It is really only through homeopathy that such behavioral patterns (walls) can be effectively altered. I have also learned that accumulated emotional suppression contributes in another important way to illness. The heavily walled person is likely to develop a serious disease later in life, through both self-destructive means of coping with chronic pent-up feelings and insensitivity to the body's messages: when to rest, sleep or engage in vigorous exercise. I feel that unless we have vividly experienced a sense of physical well-being, we will not be aware that certain tensions or emotional strains can be triggers to disease. The less able the patient is to "hear" their body's inner voice the greater the likelihood of pushing the body beyond it's optimal limits, creating the potential for illness. 
 I think as homeopaths we must know what health is. The visible signs of health are a relaxed, relatively wall-free musculature, with good posture and muscles capable of alternating tension and relaxation; a warm skin with good turgor, capable of producing warm perspiration; a lively and variable facial expression; and a regular, quiet, strong pulse. Healthy individuals are able to breathe fully and deeply. Their eyes are bright and alert with lively pupillary reactions and their eyeballs are neither protruding nor sunken. Above all, these persons will feel emotionally and physically strong and are able to experience pleasure emotionally without guilt. There are emotional indicators of good health. These include being free from anxiety, the ability to perform work in a satisfying, productive way; and particularly, the capacity for close loving relationships with others: spouse, parents, children and friends. Those patients who for one reason or another are incapable of achieving intimacy with others run a higher probability of eventually developing some form of serious illness. Just because someone is married does not necessarily mean that they are capable of having intimacy. 
 AH: You are a very keen observer, how did you nourish that within yourself? 
 Zaren: I have now been in therapy for the last twenty years. I saw in my own childhood how I was encouraged to live within my mind not my body. I was taught to think, plan, decide, analyze, and to follow through on that mental strategy. I was taught drag your body after you -attend to it only when it complains through sensations of exhaustion, tension, or distress. Otherwise follow your head.. I was taught to succeed, concentrate on your goals. Use your brain and discipline your feelings. Don't expect much pleasure in life; it is just not meant to be. I still have some of this, but I decided a long time ago to focus on my own body. When I started to do homeopathy it was very clear to me, from my own work, that the homeopath must treat the entire personality or character of the patient, and not simply his or her symptom or chief complaint. One of the very important ways to understand the organism is through the body language, and this I learned in my own process. I learned that a homeopath has to see a patient (1) through their physical expression, or body language. We can see a great deal of the patients emotional make up, particularly their unresolved tensions of suppressed feelings; (2) Through certain bodily rigidities, such as a tight jaw, raised shoulders, rigid pelvis, or stiff neck, relate to specific remedies; and (3) That in our society, most patients typically remain unaware of these chronic tensions, which I call their walls, or defenses are greatly resistant to change. 
 I discovered that long drawn out interviews with patients about their childhoods or personal difficulties were really not necessary for an accurate diagnosis or the remedy. The patients own body loudly and clearly discloses basic difficulties, such as the inability to make full emotional contact with others or to completely release longings and pent-up feelings. There are countless minute and subtle ways, the body sends a loud, urgent message to those able to read it. Words can lie. The mode of expression never lies. I think as a homeopath, we must focus on the patients breathing. You will see patients with emotional problems breathe in a shallow, superficial manner. Their breathing is far from regular with numerous spurts and sudden shift in rhythm. General body posture is also a key element in revealing the inner person. If the head is thrust forward or the pelvis pulled back or the legs locked tight at the knees, it tells us a lot about the patients inner problems. If the shoulders are hunched up, it signifies that the person is frightened and ready to ward off an expected attack (stram.). The extent to which an individual moves in a relaxed, straightforward manner or keeps the shoulders erect and balanced with the ground is a measure of a healthy self. Another important indicator of the inner state is vocal quality. All of us respond spontaneously to the sound of others' voices, independent of the specific meaning of their words. I have found that the quality or emotional tone of the voice is often far more important than the patients chief complaint and is a basic indicator of emotional and physical well-being. I could go on and on, but I think you have the idea. 
 AH: Your books are rich with psychological and emotional information. 
 Zaren: As I have said earlier the mind and body are not separate or parallel to on another. In our literature there are many remedies, including the polychrests, where the emotional component is missing and we must understand this. 
 AH: How does spirituality play a part in your practice? 
 Zaren: My spiritual teacher is Sai Baba and I am very devoted to him and his teachings. I do not rely on him to give me the remedy, but my own spiritual teachings have taught me to have love and compassion for others and to keep myself centered. It is through the patient feeling my compassion for them, that helps them feel comfortable in expressing what they need to express and letting their own inner feelings come forward. 
 AH: You deal with many chronic cases, and one of the most difficult aspects of any homeopath is to separate themselves from their patients pain, I'm wondering how you accomplish that? 
 Zaren: I think its important for the patient and yourself to keep a boundary between their material and you. I learned many years ago to do this, as I used to come home in an exhausted state. It is a matter of starting to do this routinely and as time goes on it is effortless. I feel that one should not be distant, but take in what you want to take in and don't take in what you don't want to. It is very hard to come up with the correct remedy, when you merge with the patient, and you should remember it is hindering the homeopathic process, and the patient can feel this. 
 AH: Do you take homeopathic remedies? 
 Zaren: Unfortunately, I went to many very good homeopaths and have never received the correct remedy. 
 AH: It must be disconcerting to see how beautifully the remedies work, and never come to your own constitutional remedy. 
 Zaren: I don't have any problem with that. I am put in a position to help the patient heal, and every day I see many miracles. I have taken other steps to help myself heal. 
 AH: In looking at women in homeopathy, has there ever been one woman who has had an influential impact on your life? 
 Zaren: When I was starting to study homeopathy, there were mostly men, so I never had an opportunity to study with a woman. 
 AH: Do you think that more women should be involved in homeopathy? 
 Zaren: I do. I think women are naturals for this work and usually have a more sensitive approach and many women patients would prefer a female homeopath. 
 AH: How have you found in your own practice that translation from the feeling into literature? 
 Zaren: By not living in my mind when I take a case, by understanding body language, by understanding and feeling the vital force. When we, as a homeopath, can read this, the patient does not have to talk. If we know the patient well enough, we know what is going on without being spoken. However, we must use the repertory to confirm all of our findings. 
 AH: You have done a great job in your books of translating the feelings into words, it must have been difficult. 
 Zaren: As the years are going on, it becomes a little easier. I am also doing a great deal of work on myself, which is imperative in becoming softer and more present for the patient and in writing my books. 
 AH: What has been one of your most significant cases? 
 Zaren: I am very lucky to feel that all of my cases are very significant, and all with a different flavor. One case, however, comes to mind. I was doing a seminar in Munich three years ago. A married couple who were both homeopaths approached me to do their child's' case. She was a three month old infant in the hospital. The infants' mother had seven miscarriages and finally she became pregnant with this child. At five months in utero the baby was born. It was put in a special intensive care unit for these type of high risk infants. By the time I treated this baby, there were two operations that already taken place because of the heart. The baby could not breath on its own, and there was an alarm system as well as a breathing machine attached to the baby and the crib. The baby had to be tube fed. When the mother tried to nurse the baby, the baby would arch its back and refuse the breast milk, with the little strength that it had. The nursing staff asked that the baby not be touched too much, as this burns calories, and the baby cannot afford to burn any calories. The mother put a tape recorder in the crib and the baby often listened to this. The baby had mild hyperbilirunemia at birth, and by the time I saw the baby it was considered autistic. The baby had no eye contact and just stared off into space in a very indifferent dreamlike state. The baby was very pale, with dull eyes and almost appeared lifeless. If the drapes were opened in the room even minimally, the baby would cry. It did not like the sunlight or any other light to touch the eyes. The baby was due to have an operation in three days as the retina had detached from both eyes. I told the parents to give the baby Natrum sulphuricum 200c. The next morning I left to come back to the United States. The next day the remedy was given to the baby, within 30 minutes the baby opened its eyes looking directly into the mothers eyes and making very good contact for about one hour. This did not last as the doctors started to give the baby many painful eye examinations and the baby closed its eyes again. The next day the parents arrived at the hospital and they saw no baby in the crib. They were very upset and a nurse said to them "there was a miracle that happened last night." She said the baby started to breathe on its own and they decided that the baby did not need to have the eye operation. The baby was observed for one week and then was allowed to go home. This was another example of the miracle of what homeopathy can do. 
 AH: Could you tell me a little about your childhood? 
 Zaren: I was born as a twin to a male, and have a brother three years older than myself. A tragedy occurred when I was twelve years old and my mother died. The whole family system changed and I was left alone a great deal, as my father worked a lot. I was not given very much affection and felt very lonely. This is where my own family became dysfunctional and my own wounding took place at this time. My brothers and I were very distant to each other and very little communication took place. I had a great deal of grief, abandonment, and neglect. I truly understand when a patient comes in that has any of that. Fortunately, I knew that something was wrong with me, and I sought out therapy twenty years ago. 
Anne schadde takes a case 
 My observation in my practice has been that as therapists we are only able to carefully observe and understand what is happening in the evolution of an individual person. There is no forecast as to how healing with regard to a family's dynamics should take place. In many cases the family-dynamic actually maintains the patient's illness (see Organon ? 4: (disease cause)). All obstacles to cure must be removed before there is a possibility of cure. 

Interview with Nandita Shah

AH: Nandita, how did you come to practice homeopathy in Bombay?
 Shah: Yes. It is because of homeopathy that I live in Bombay. I feel the only way for me to grow in homeopathy is to practice homeopathy in Bombay. I would love to be in a more rural area, but you can't go to a village and grow in homeopathy because there is no interaction with other homeopaths. I found that the interaction was very important. I've learned a lot from my colleagues.
 AH: Tell me about your colleagues.
 Shah: We try to meet at least once a month. Rajan Sankaran, Sujit Chatterjee, Sunil Anand, Jayesh Shah, and myself. When we all start to think about something together, we have beautiful results. Sometimes we have disasters, but, even so, the thought process is interesting.
 AH: Do you each contribute to the group?

 Shah: Rajan has been an inspiration because he has been a step ahead. But we also do things in our practice which we can report back to the others, it's not just one way, of course. Each of us is a part.
 AH: How does the study group work?
 Shah: Rajan is able to see things deeper than I am able to. But we pick up the ideas quickly and are able to confirm them in our own practice. He couldn't have developed his ideas as well without the confirmation of other people. And we're growing from him, and amongst ourselves. For instance, one of us will take a case and will really understand it, and then we have a meeting and share our cases among the five of us. Very often we solve cases together which we couldn't solve alone.
 AH: How has the study group been helpful to your growth as a homeopath?
 Shah: I think I've learned a lot from them, and their enthusiasm, and the good work has been the inspiration to me to try to do better in my own cases. Every patient requires a certain remedy, and we as homeopaths should be able to find the this remedy, irrespective of the process we use. I think there will be one correct, or most suitable remedy, whichever way you find it -through the understanding of the dreams, the mental state, the physicals, or the gestures -it doesn't matter. It could even be through hair analysis. But we should come to the same remedy ultimately if we are to cure. When we discuss a case together, more and more we can come to a similar remedy. It gives us all confidence that we are working in the right direction. Of course, it doesn't work all the time, but we can aim towards understanding the patient to the point that there is no dispute. We can see a video case, and someone comes up with the remedy, and the rest can say, Oh yes, that's true, because through a well-taken case, you can really understand the central point. And though we still make mistakes, hopefully we will learn from them. You know, initially when you are a homeopath, you have a lot of uncertainties. You prescribe a remedy and you are not sure what will happen. You are waiting for the results. Eventually you know more what to expect. You know what is likely to happen to the patient when you give the remedy. Other colleagues also have study groups of 5 to 10 people -they too are doing provings and consult to together.
 AH: Have you seen changes from this in Bombay?
 Shah: Most definitely. You can feel the change in homeopathy in Bombay. You can see a new direction. Now many people are really enthusiastic about homeopathy. Before, people went to homeopathic colleges so they could practice general medicine when they got out. In my class or Rajan's class, only 10 to 15% did practice homeopathy, after going through the college. Now it's something like 75 to 80%. There's a large rebirth in homeopathy in Bombay, and the whole world, don't you think?
 AH: Tell me something about the way you prescribe. How do you decide what potency to use?
 Shah: It depends on how clearly you see the picture of the remedy in the case. The sharper you see the remedy, the higher the potency. If you can just about see the mental state, as is common in deeper pathologies, then you start with a lower potency. Of course, there are times when I have the remedy only in 30c, so I give it and it works, even when the case is very sharp.
 AH: How long is the interval between follow-up visits for your patients?
 Shah: It depends. Sometimes I have them call that same evening, but usually two weeks, or one month. Most of my patients live nearby. As there are so many homeopaths in Bombay, no one needs to travel far to see a homeopath. What we do usually is spend lot of time on the new case and very little time for the follow-up. Often the follow-ups are just to check that everything is going as expected. I see a follow-up in 5 minutes, 3 minutes, maybe 10 minutes.
 AH: What do you ask in follow-up?
 Shah: We just ask, "How are you?" A patient doesn't need a change of remedy very often, unless of course one hasn't found the right remedy in the first place. It usually takes a long time for the patient's state to change that much. So the follow-up visit is just to check whether the first prescription is correct, whether a repetition is required, or to handle an acute problem.
 AH: Do you always prescribe during the first visit? Do you always know the remedy right away?
 Shah: I try to not prescribe until I feel I really understand the patient, until I know what to give them, because a wrong prescription may add confusion. If I can't do it in the first one and a half or two hours that I interview them, I give them another appointment and I see them again. Once I prescribe, I usually don't change the remedy for a while. But there are still occasions when I'm not sure of the prescription I give to the patient.
 AH: For follow-ups do you give placebo?
 Shah: Yes, it's very common. Our way of practice is totally different than what you see in the west because most of the patients don't know much about homeopathy, nor do they care to know. They just know sometimes that it doesn't have the side effects that allopathy has. We tell them not to take any other medicine when they are being treated homeopathically, but if they were given only a single dose and no placebo, they may not be aware that they are under treatment and may take medicines for acutes, for instance. So placebo is something to keep them aware that they are under treatment. And if they have a headache and you don't want to prescribe for the acute disease, it is very easy to say, "Put some pills in water," or "take an extra dose of your medicine." Then they feel they've done something, and you're not pressured to give them medicine for all their complaints, because they feel they are already taking something. I feel it works very well in India. It's also our method of payment. We don't charge by appointment. We charge by the number of days we are giving medicine for. And if we see a patient for 5 minutes or 25 minutes, we still charge the same. They don't feel they have more right to your time, either, because they will be paying the same amount if they stay for 5 minutes or 25. You can spend with them the time they need. I personally like to have little check on my patients more often and not spend too much time with it. So I am happy with this method.
 AH: There is a movement on in the United States for homeopathic education of the patient, how do you feel about this?
 Shah: I don't feel it is helpful for a person to read his remedy without understanding homeopathy. When I treat a colleague, I don't always tell him the remedy. How does it help to know what the remedy is? In fact, I think it could prejudice the patient. The patient comes to us for treatment, and we are doing an honest job of treatment. Placebo never hurts anybody, and if it can help, why should you feel guilty about giving placebo. I cannot understand this. I feel if it can help, then there is nothing wrong with it, and I find it definitely helps my patients. Because it's a form of reassurance. If they have some problem, they take some placebo, they feel they are on some medicine, and don't have to go for the pain killer. Very often when I am weaning my patients off pain killers or palliative allopathic drugs, I give them placebo and it works very well. If you feel that something is wrong, it becomes wrong, but if you really don't feel that it is wrong, you can go ahead and do it. There are some people you can tell their remedy to. It depends on the patient and his level of understanding of homeopathy.
 AH: Tell me about your assistants.
 Shah: They are new homeopaths. They are students who have passed their college exams and who have begun their practice. Maybe they practice in the evening and sit in with me in the morning. Or vice versa. They work with me for a whole year. They see all the patients and follow-ups for one year. They see one new case every day. The assistants see all the cases. So they know what to expect. Some of my assistants are really great homeopaths, and I refer my patients to them if they live closer to one of my assistants.
 AH: Do you feel it affects your case taking to have your assistant in the room when you take the case?
 Shah: A few patients won't open up as much. It's always nice to have a break without the assistant, because then some patients do feel freer. It does slightly affect case taking, but I also feel that when we have someone watching over what we do, we are more cautious about every step we take. So it also improves our own practice. There are good and bad things about it.
 AH: You don't feel that you ever miss a case because of the presence of the assistant?
 Shah: No, I take the liberty of sending my assistant out for a few patients here and there.
 AH: Do you feel you have to change your case-taking in any way when your assistant is present?
 Shah: Not really. My assistants don't participate in the case-taking until the end. Then if they have something to ask, they may. Most patients are quite OK when they know this is an assistant .
 AH: Do you ask the patient's permission for the assistant to sit in before hand?
 Shah: No. When you don't make an issue of it, they don't think about it either. Occasionally someone will ask to speak to me alone.
 AH: Are there pros and cons to having students sit in on your clinic?
 Shah: How are people going to learn without sitting in? How would students learn to do an operation without watching? It is not possible. How will you train other good homeopaths? I feel it has also helped me, because it has made me conscious of everything I do in practice. I have to have a reason for it. Sometimes I might prescribe, saying probably this is going to work, or I feel it's right. But with the student's watching, you have to have a reason. Every time you do something, it makes things clearer for you too. I'm very comfortable with it. In fact, I think it can bring out the best in me.
 AH: Do you do other teaching in India?
 Shah: I haven't taught in a formal way in the college, because I just can't go twice a week -it's too far. The students have a kind of union where they invite people to give lectures on Saturdays or Sundays. So I go then, speak, and show cases.
 AH: Do you have any hobbies?
 Shah: I have a lot of other interests. But there is very little time. I wish I had time for some fine art. Pottery and painting are things I would really like to do. I love to learn languages. I am learning Italian right now on the side and I studied French earlier.
 AH: How will you apply your new use of the Italian language?
 Shah: It's just something I really enjoy. When you read a book in French, it's totally different from how a book would be written in English, so you get a totally different outlook on another culture and you can get that only really through the language. I love traveling, and seeing different cultures. Italy is a country I love, and as most Italians don't speak English, I decided to learn it. I would like also to learn German but fortunately most Germans speak English so it can wait.
 AH: What else interests you?
 Shah: I like to garden organically. Ideally I would like to live in a rural area, and live a more natural life. Isn't it ironic that we are advocating a system of healing based on nature's laws, but everything else we are doing is against nature's laws!
 AH: Organic gardening in India is not common!
 Shah: It's getting more popular than it was before. There are a few health food stores, and people are growing things without chemicals. It's becoming more popular, but the Indian farmers feel as the Indian patients do: any medicine is good. The farmers feel that any pesticides can only do good, so sometimes they use much more than they should. The awareness is coming and it's good. Organic gardening is just beginning on a mass scale, because people are realizing they can get more money for the produce.
 In 1985, I read a book called The One Straw Revolution and what really struck me is that the author, Masanobu Fukuoka, was writing about agriculture, but his philosophy was the same as our homeopathic philosophy. While I was reading this book I felt I could have been reading a book of homeopathy. He called his method of farming, "do-nothing farming." He said that man is always trying to do more and more, but is causing, through his efforts, his own destruction. You can see this in general in the world today. It looks like we have made a lot of progress, but in actuality life has become more and more stressful. To summarize his views on farming: he says that plowing the fields (done to aerate the soil) destroys the microorganisms in the soil, that would have naturally aerated the soil. But not only do the microorganisms aerate the soil, they also fertilize it naturally. Plowed soil needs fertilizer. When plants grow on fertilizers instead of natural nutrients, they are more vulnerable to disease. That's why we need pesticides and herbicides. And plants brought up this way are not only harmful to us, but lack flavor, and nutrients. As a result, we add vitamins to our diet and so the chain goes on... Crops should be grown intermingled with one another, as they occur in nature, so they have a symbiotic relationship with the soil and its nutrients. The soil doesn't get depleted of any one mineral, and they are not easy prey to pests which multiply very fast in a field which contains solely their favorite food. But man makes everything more complicated through modern methods of farming. In fact, natural farming is also more economical because although something may be lost to pests, and the fact that harvesting is more labor intensive, there is still substantial savings on fertilizers pesticide, herbicides, etc. In terms of man, to use an analogy, fertilizers are similar to vitamins, required when we switch to an unnatural diet of chemically processed foods. This weakens our immune response, and to counteract that, we use vaccinations and antibiotics, similar to the herbicides and pesticides used on plants. But are we really getting anywhere?
 AH: This "more is better" is the philosophy of allopathy.
 Shah: Yes, but it is also the way we homeopaths see the world. I think it's the basic quality of man as opposed to the rest of nature. I remember many years ago I was walking with Jeremy Sherr, and I said the basic problem of India is the population, that maybe compulsory family planning as in China would be the solution. Jeremy said, "But reproduction is natural. The solution must lie somewhere else." A couple of years later, I went to Senegal, and I found the answer. Senegal is a small country with not a very high population, but it seemed that 90% of the population was young. There must be at least 10 kids to every adult.
 Northern Senegal is desert, and Southern, on the border of tropical rain forest. All over Senegal are projects for safe drinking water, medical aid, road building, development in various ways. These are undertaken by western countries as aid. But the Senegalese, who are basically village people, don't even know what to do with themselves in the city and there are plenty of beggars. They are basically rural people. Then we went off the only road that encircles the country into a village in the interior, where the western influence was just beginning to reach. (They had just been gifted a machine to polish rice!). There the population (child to adult ratio) was normal. The people were happy, smiling. Three French-speaking boys who had returned from a city school took us around their village. They did not practice agriculture but they had the sweetest mangoes and pineapples we ever tasted. They would kill a monkey or wild boar whenever they needed food and the forest was filled with gourds, and yams and other edible vegetables that could be found by a brief search. Every evening they made merry with music and dance and all their needs were met by the environment. This was in contrast with the rural communities accessible from the roads. These were acres of barren land -the villagers had been taught agriculture through various projects, and they needed it to feed their multitudes -the gift of modern medicine -but they had no concept of this and so they would move from one plot of forest land to another, cutting down the trees, but not having the skills to keep the land from erosion and barrenness after. Another reminder of the way we humans destroy ourselves with our greed for more. In a few years this country, facing rapid desertification, will be struck by drought and famine -which it never knew before. I think we have to think of ways to go back to nature, and we, as homeopaths, need to work in this direction too, because medicine only cannot cure the sickness of this world. We need to look for homoeopathic solutions for the non-medical problems too. There have been many situations in my life where I have done things in an allopathic way. We try to solve the problem by opposing it. For instance, once my father was very depressed and his house was also looking very broken down. So I thought the way to help him get out of this depression would be to fix up his house. He moved into the last room while the rest of the house was being renovated. And when it was finished, he stayed in the last room. I realized then what an allopathic method I had used to help him get better. Before he had a reason to feel depressed. Now he had no reason, and was still depressed.
 AH: You would like to be an organic farmer?
 Shah: I would like to live in a place where I could be more in tune with nature in every way. I am far from that now. I live in Bombay. I've been thinking about moving for a long time. I feel that if you are a homeopath, then you need to look at other aspects of life which have to do with health. I feel that you have to include everything, that is, things that are for healthful living. I think and hope the whole world is slowly moving in this direction, at least beginning to think about it, because there is a limit to what materialism can bring you. When you get saturated with materialism, you have to go back to the other side. Someone has to begin. This is something that I would really like to do.
 AH: The draw to a more natural life is becoming more attractive to many.
 Shah: This reminds me of an article I read called "The Farmer and the Industrialist." There was a very poor farmer living in an underdeveloped country. The sun was hot and he had worked hard in the fields all morning. So after a hearty lunch he took a little nap in the shade of the old tree. To this underdeveloped country came a very rich industrialist from a technologically advanced country to establish whether it would be worth his while to invest a huge sum of money in some industry. After driving several miserable hours in the hot sun, he saw the poor farmer asleep under the shade of the old tree, and it was just too much for him to bear. "Stop the car," he shouted to the driver and stormed across the road as fast as his heart condition would allow, and woke up the poor farmer by shouting, "What do you think you are doing?" "I was taking a nap in the shade of this old tree," replied the farmer as politely as he could, thinking it was quite obvious. "Don't you know there is work to be done?" "I've been working all morning..." But the industrialist stormed, "If you people were to get a hold of yourselves and change your ways, work harder and longer you might be able to save money and invest it in a profitable business, branch out, install a plant, automation, get your capital back, buy out your competitors and climb to the top." "What I would do then, sir?" said the perplexed farmer. "Do?" shouted the industrialist. "Why, you could delegate responsibility to subordinates, relax for a change. Live on the income, with a house in the country; good food, pretty girls. Soak up a little sunshine." "Sir, my house is already in the country; the food cooked by my mother is the envy of every woman in the district; my sweetheart prettier than any girl I've seen; and was I not asleep in the sunshine when you awoke me?"
 Nandita Shah
 22 Matru Chhaya, 70 Marine Dr
 Mumbai 400020
 India
 Tel 2064949
 Fax 3680414
 email - nanditagiasbm01. vsnl. net. in